This page is to describe Feminism, what it is, it’s roots, the good it’s done and how it has degenerated into the Massively profitable, society destroying Mis-Information Business model it is now.
This page can be heavy reading. If you want to know why it’s worth the time, skip to the lower sections then come back and read with the final 2 sections in mind.
Why has Feminism become so destructively radical, to the point of Fundamentalism?
Clearly, all of the rights and equalities pursued by the Women’s Liberation movement, First Wave Feminism and Second Wave Feminism have not just long been enshrined in legislation, they’ve now permeated Western society to the point where Active Feminism is now a very minority of women. You only need to see the schock on the faces of the kids sorting balls to know even children deservedly expect equality.
How many women are Feminists and where does it lead?
The vast majority of women no longer even consider themselves as unequal. Sure, most women recognise there are Gender differences that cause nominal advantages and disadvantages but up until probably 10-15 years ago, Equality was quite well achieved. During these phases of Feminism, I was a clear supporter, as long as equality was the target. I still support several Non-Radical Feminist principles and groups.
Why didn’t things settle down once equality was achieved? My opinion after researching many ideas; Power, Anger, Entitlement mentality and Financial greed. Logically, with enormous deliberately manufactured gender conflict, misandry higher than any historic period. A fine thanks for most men supporting Equality legislation.
Feminist activism today has denigrated to covert lobbying with willfully disingenuous Information combined with deceptive behaviour and devious misrepresentation of statistics. This includes Child Brainwashing, deliberate degradation of men and malicious entrapment of men.
Unfortunately, the movement has been taken over by Entitlement minded Third and Fourth wave feminists who, on the surface, appear to just want to find anything to antagonise and fight about. That’s sort of right. That’s the Rank and File of the movement. They’re the Angry demanders you see and hear.
The movement leaders and partner companies understand conflict generates power, profit is generated from power. These leaders are the people motivating the Angry plebs you see yelling on the street. Little do most Angry plebs realise, they’re just the noisemakers enabling the Feminist Leaders’ Business model to make its fortune. The more anger and publicity the Rank and File create, the greater the lobbying power for the Movement leaders to sell super profitable services. Services ranging from ludicrously incorrect advertising campaigns to designing and organising societally unwanted education for children, incommensurate data surveys or my personal favourite, providing One-Sided studies demonstrating how men need more legal restraint and must take more responsibility for bad female behaviour.
With the massive noise and humongous advertising budgets Feminists use to control media, you’d assume it’s like 97.23% of women identify as Feminist. Guess again, 75%, No, try again, 50%? Not even close. Independant Western World surveys show a little over 1/5th, yes, less than 25% even identify themselves as Feminist. In fact, more than half of Western world women see Feminism as negative. Ironically, Feminist designed and implemented surveys declare figures of up to 90%.
But all these Male domination, Rape Culture and Violence issues are huge aren’t they? Well, yes, especially if you ask Radical Feminists. What’s even more destructive now, Feminism has formed into a higher number of unregulated, VERY LOUD, well organised, highly funded Splinter group factions. Each Radical Feminists group screams their own particular brand, element or tilt on Feminism. These factions are Quasi-tied together under a Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism umbrella, Hi-jacking the term Feminism.
How has Feminism justified placing all blame on men, for everything?
That is a great question. A question even most younger feminists couldn’t answer.
The answer is the Feminist model has adopted and sold the Duluth model. The Duluth Model used what’s known as Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs (DAIP) began in 1980 as an initiative to reform the criminal justice system in Duluth, Minnesota. This effort became known as “The Duluth Model.” Is that a problem?
That’s not the Million Dollar question, it’s the Multi-Billion Dollar question and Oh, boy, did they get it wrong!
The Duluth Model is empirically flawed, clearly, this theory cannot possibly be correct unless you deliberately build an entire new reality around it, which is exactly what has been done using illogical Neo-Marxism, Postmodernism thinking adopted by no-one other than the Feminist movement and those they could sell it to. I used the term, sell it, both deliberately and correctly!
It was first sold to our criminal Judicial systems, then to law makers rewriting Family law throughout the Western world. It’s been sold to Universities, Police forces, Human resource education and many others.
Family Law systems and processes have clearly been written wrapped very tightly in the Duluth model as will be obvious very soon.
Why is the Duluth Model critically flawed
I can go through their teachings Line by Line, Wheel by Wheel as they interpret the world or direct you to the Duluth Model website. When you’re there, please look for all the ways a woman can be a victim, then look for all the ways a woman can be hurt. Next look for all I can go through their teachings Line by Line, Wheel by Wheel as they interpret the world or direct you to the Duluth Model website. When you’re there, please look for all the ways a woman can be a victim, then look for all the ways a woman can be hurt. Next look for all the ways children can be victims, then look for all the ways children can be hurt. Please check out the Men’s Non-Violence courses. The wheels clearly teach about
The Duluth Model says HE’s not allowed to;
- Making her afraid by using looks
- Making her afraid by actions
- Making her afraid by gestures
- Smashing things
- Destroying her property
- Abusing pets
- Displaying weapons
- Putting her down,
- Making her feel bad about herself,
- Calling her names,
- Making her think she’s crazy
- Playing mind games
- Humiliating her
- Making her feel guilty
- Controlling what she does
- Controlling who she sees and talks to
- Controlling what she reads
- Controlling where she goes
- Limiting her outside involvement
- Using jealousy to justify actions
- Minimizing, Denying and Blaming
- Making light of the abuse and not taking her concerns about it seriously
- Saying the abuse didn’t happen
- Shifting responsibility for abusive behaviour
- Saying she caused it
- Making her feel guilty about the children
- Using the children to relay messages
- Using visitation to harass her
- Threatening to take the children away
- Treating her like a servant
- Making all the big decisions
- Acting like the “master of the castle”
- Being the one to define men’s and women’s roles
- Preventing her from getting or keeping a job
- Making her ask for money
- Giving her an allowance
- Taking her money
- Not letting her know about or have access to family income
- Making and/or carrying out threats to do something to hurt her
- Threatening to leave her
- Threatening to commit suicide
- Threatening to report her to welfare
- Making her drop charges
- Making her do illegal things
I feel I can speak for every male friend as well as myself on this issue. If any of us was aware any man was abusing either a woman or children, we wouldn’t question doing everything possible to intervene immediately and ensure an offending male was brought to justice, one way or another!
With clear position stated, now, please go back and inspect the site, the wheels, the downloads, the supporting information and education materials and education courses one more time. Please help me identify where she may, just slightly, in any possible way, just by a sliver possibly bear any responsibility for anything
Please find me references to possibility she may be the abuser, the basher, the intimidator, the emotional abuser, the isolator, etc, etc. Please find where she may practice coercion or threats, economic abuse, use children let alone use FEMALE PRIVILEGE.
How would Feminism, Criminal law, Family Law and Universities look if it said;
- Making him afraid by using looks
- Making him afraid by actions
- Making him afraid by gestures
- Smashing things
- Destroying her property
- Abusing pets
- Displaying weapons
- Putting him down,
- Making him feel bad about herself,
- Calling him names,
- Making him think he’s crazy
- Playing mind games
- Humiliating him
- Making him feel guilty
- Controlling what he does
- Controlling who he sees and talks to
- Controlling what he reads
- Controlling where he goes
- Limiting his outside involvement
- Using jealousy to justify actions
- Minimizing, Denying and Blaming
- Making light of the abuse and not taking his concerns about it seriously
- Saying the abuse didn’t happen
- Shifting responsibility for abusive behaviour
- Saying he caused it
- Making him feel guilty about the children
- Using the children to relay messages
- Using visitation to harass him
- Threatening to take the children away
- Treating him like a servant (or just a paycheck)
- Making all the big decisions
- acting like the “Queen of the castle”
- being the one to define men’s and women’s roles
- Preventing him from getting or keeping a job
- making him ask for money
- Giving him an allowance
- Taking his money
- Not letting him know about or have access to family income
- Making and/or carrying out threats to do something to hurt him
- Threatening to leave him
- Threatening to commit suicide
- Threatening to report him to welfare or Child Support
- Making him drop charges
- Making him do illegal things
Obviously, as well as the things on Duluth’s SHIT-LIST. Men don’t want Tyrannical Overlord power to destroy women. TRUE Equality is just fine! Hang on, maybe these should be the new rules, let me think about that. Maybe it’s payback time! Haha!
Clearly the principle creator, Ellen Louise Pence (April 15, 1948 – January 6, 2012) a social activist and Feminist was either outright delusional or was just completely hell-bent on blaming men for every possibility. The theory provides virtually no realistic possibilities a woman can have either started or escalated conflict and appears totally dismissive of female violence, abuse, coercion, emotional abuse etc. I don’t know if this was written out of spite, hatred, coercion of others. I wasn’t there but when you read the material, it was certainly a single gendered Circle-Jerk that penned it.
This entire theory is Nonsensical.
How do I know so strongly how wrong this theory is? Personal Experience!
If you’d like to see the Truth of Domestic Violence, click the link
Why do Feminists adopt, sell, mandate and push the Duluth Model?
Really, do I really have to type that all over again?
The Duluth model blames men for every possibility. The theory provides virtually no realistic possibilities a woman can have either started or escalated conflict and appears totally dismissive of female violence, abuse, coercion, emotional abuse etc. This makes it the absolutely ideal platform for hate speech, Female victimisation, Female financial benefits Females to be awarded men’s property, etc.
This fits perfectly the illogical Neo-Marxist, Postmodernism thinking Feminist movement who want every defect in society to be completely and totally the fault of a Tyrannical Patriarchal Hierarchy.
Why did Courts, Universities and Law makers accept it?
Massive covert lobbying by a well funded, well organised political machine that had no mobile opposition.
Why did it stay?
Efficiency! It was very cheap, fast and easy to administer from a court’s perspective, both short and long term. “Poor innocent, inoffensive, truthful woman defiled by Vicious, Abusive Coercive man. SLAM-DUNK! No need to listen to much after the opening statement.” That’s what Duluth says;
- Convict or Penalise Man
- Give kids to woman
- Give assets to woman
- Give Man’s income to woman
- Award damages to woman
- Now, she doesn’t rely on Social Welfare or have to work unless she wants to.
- No ongoing conflict because HE has learned how the system won’t even listen to his evidence, facts or statistics.
Universities are embracing it even more firmly than Judicial systems because of their Far-Left wing stance and larger female constituency. Within just a few short years, Universities will most likely have eliminated Male students other than in the core STEM subjects. The subjects females generally have little interest in
So what is this Third and Fourth wave feminism?
When all the legal framework and application of equality law was well entrenched, the Angry, Entitled part of the mob refused to stop. They were making huge money out of the memberships, still receiving enormous government and donor funding but there was no clear target to aim at because the list of demands (Log of Claims) had been met. The answer was simple really Third Wave Feminism openly accepted achievement of “traditional feminist agendas” so they sought to challenge or avoid what it deemed the second wave’s essentialist definitions of feminism.
In other words, Third and Fourth Waver’s were free to create an entirely new SHIT-LIST to throw at men. According to their own tenure, that list is able to be redefined, altered, changed by any individual identifying as Feminist.
third-wave feminists embraced individualism in women and diversity and sought to redefine what it meant to be a feminist.[2][5][6] The third wave saw the emergence of new feminist currents and theories, such as intersectionality, sex positivity, vegetarian ecofeminism, transfeminism, and postmodern feminism. According to feminist scholar Elizabeth Evans, the “confusion surrounding what constitutes third-wave feminism is in some respects its defining feature.”[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism
We’re now into what’s known as Fourth Wave Feminism which has adopted it’s own further splintered lists of at least 8 Feminist Types together with an innumerable list of complaints ranging from Domestic Violence, Body Shaming, Oppression, Legal rights, degradation, prostitution, childcare, and seriously, if you look hard enough, the color ranges of plastic will be a Male-Forced form of oppression if you look hard enough.
In order to keep to keep this diversity of Feminism, we now have huge numbers of organisations ranging from small clubs to multi-million dollar industries built around these themes. Every one of these groups is struggling for membership amongst a declining population of women prepared to Fly the Flag. This is why the remainder demand total loyalty and strict adherence to the tenure.
So how do you pay for all this? Really simple, Follow any Human Right model. Adopt it as a war, What are the steps to fight any war? See if this follows Hitler’s pattern right up to the physical attacks.
- Create views why you’re not getting what you want
- Choose an Enemy
- Create polarising arguments why the enemy is responsible
- Ignore true statistics, create your own artificial stories and statistics
- Publicise how you’ve been hurt (not getting what you want)
- Campaign for membership
- Extract fees, charges etc to invest into radicalising sales material
- Start your Propaganda campaign to the public.
- Rinse and repeat 3 to 8
- Demand public or agency funding to assist victims
- Demand public or agency funding to campaign against problem
- Implement Extremist, Alarmist Disaster and Danger languaging
- Lobby politicians using the Shawshank Redemption library funding request method for small law changes
- Start allegations or have your members create allegation case studies (true or false is irrelevant)
- Quote case studies as FACTS
- Lobby using artificial manufactured data
- Create stories by having members interview other members, push fictitious stories through all Media channels.
- Implement demands for studies to be done using your biased prescribed questions to get answers you want
- Control groups studied (ie only survey women) ignoring Random Respondent survey rules.
- Collaborate with Members using data to generate higher Alarmist levels to build more propaganda material.
- Rinse and Repeat 3 to 21
By continuing this process repetitively, dreaming up more complaints by endless staring at Duluth’s Wheels, creating cumulative small law changes. Nobody fights the small incremental law changes until massive damage has reached public revulsion level. By this time, culturally, this indoctrination has permeated society with the general populace not having a clue they’ve been coerced into believing all this deliberately manufactured dogma.
Feminist management knows, the angrier you can get the plebs and the wider and louder the plebs scream, their pier pressure ensures ongoing new members. There’ll always be a long line of Angry/Entitled people subscribing to this dogma because it eliminates any personal responsibility for their dissatisfaction or lack of success. On subscription to feminism, nothing is ever their fault again. Everything is the fault of this dangerously, tyrannical patriarchal oppression machine that stops me achieving. If you don’t believe that statement, ask why Brainwashed people willingly strap explosives to their bodies then go blow themselves up in a crowded place to “Get their Oppressors back”. That’s Radicalised Ideology in a nutshell.
How do you silence Men?
That’s not so hard at all, men by nature aren’t huge Team players. Yes, they play on Sports teams, they form interest based clubs and so forth but generally, men either best work alone or in small groups and generally only change that for competitive or collaborative play. Men, by nature don’t want to either fight with or be seen to fight with women. It contradicts normal Animal and Human instinct to protect females. To even try to set up groups to conflict with females sets up Cognitive Dissonance triggers in us. That’s why all the traditional marriage Memes like “Happy Wife, Happy Life” or “Whatever she asks, Just say Yes!” have been around longer than I have.
Men, when confronted by women, will try to soothe the waters, settle things and where needed, go hide in the “Man-Cave” until things settle. Unfortunately, this instinct has been taken advantage of far too long and the penalties are now way to high. In Self Defence, against the Financial, Legal, Health, Property and social Rights men have lost, a few Men’s Groups have started forming in attempts to claw back Equality and reestablish balance.
In Standard form, as soon as a Men’s Group forms, they’re relentlessly attacked by Feminist groups, always trying to blame the Male participants screaming Men’s Groups are Attacking Women or Feminists.
Rather than me waffle on about it, how about I hand you over to Karen Straughan, a lady who’s studied this attack dog mentality.
I understand by putting content like this out there, I’m just as likely to come under attack like others who’ve spoken of statistical misinformation at the core of the Radical Feminist movement. I get the concept of becoming a marked zebra
The Funny Part
Once you understand how this highly lucrative industry works, it really is quite amusing to watch. The part that’s so funny is the most Dedicated Loud, Screaming, Antagonists are the ones that get the screwed over by the whole deal. The Attack Dog Plebs are eternally unhappy, outside their comrades no one likes them, men won’t keep calling them back, many end up with criminal convictions, they see the world through Shit-Stained glasses and live in fear their piers will turn on them like Erin Pizzey who received Feminist’s death and bomb threats and had a pet murdered simply for acknowledging men are often assaulted by women as well.
If you think Erin Pizzey was the only woman or person targeted with violence, death threats, bomb threats and so forth, you may try researching Esther Vilar, Suzanne Steinmetz, Richard Gelles Murray Straus
I see the Modern Feminist movement as a very clever multi level marketing system. As the Generals or Sergeants recognise the size of the Financial pie the Top Level Feminist organisers are chewing on, they realise they’ll only ever be a small fish in a big pond, arranging and working for the Business profiteers.
The answer to the profits? Look for a niche, then start their own brand/tilt/form of feminism. These splinter groups, just like religion, allow those little fish to find their own small pond and become the big fish in it. So, like Christianity, you have Catholic, Anglican, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, Seven Day Bike Riders, Brethren, Hussites & Quakers, just to name a few. In Feminism, we have dozens including Liberal, Radical, Cultural, Socialist, Marxist, Eco, Black, Postmodern, Postculture, Separatist and I-Feminism, just to name a few! Due to it’s Financial profitability and ease to recruit entitled, angry plebs, Radical Feminism, especially has spawned many other types of Feminism.
This is a huge USD $Multi-Billion industry.
The Money and the profit shares per group
| Level Name | Purpose | True Care Factor | Militancy | Profit %age | Business Value |
| Top Level | Plan and design strategies and campaigns. Plot objectives and sequence targets. Own/Control Financial Trust/Company structure. Control ownership of Support properties where possible. Own/Control Marketing and/or Support businesses | Seriously? This is about money | Agitators of Militancy | Large | $Hundreds of Millions |
| Generals | Organise and implement marketing strategies and organise Lobbyists. Design and sequence Marketing tools, materials and advertising. Run Feminism meetings, Indoctrinate plebs. | Very High, at least until they realise this is about money | High | Low | Good Pay Rate plus large bonuses |
| Sergeants | Organise and implement support services such as emergency housing, support workers, advocates and client legal-aid etc. Run Feminism meetings, Indoctrinate plebs. | Very High, at least until they realise this is about money | High | Low | Fair Pay Rate plus small bonuses |
| Lobbyists | Prepare and submit Lobby submissions. Prepare templates for plebs to mass mail | High | Dedicated Back room helpers | Low | Fair Pay Rate plus small bonuses |
| Marketing Businesses | Provide marketing materials ranging from Flyers to TV Campaigns. | Low. Pretence of High | Pretence of High | HUGE | Huge Turnover with very low overhead |
| Support Businesses | Provide Female support services such as housing, Social support systems, Material aid etc | Medium to High | Theatrical | Medium | High turnover with reliable clientele and steady Govt and Donor funding |
| Small Businesses | Sell Feminism based products, regularly by drop-shipping, usually Feminism-brand aligned providing donations to Feminist groups | Pretence of High | Theatrical | Small to Medium | Anything from small Part time income to a few hundred thousand dollars per year |
| Plebs | Stir Shit, Make a nuisance of themselves, Agitate, Make life hard for others | Medium to Extreme | Range Normal to Extreme | Negative | Most Plebs pay their own expenses and supply their own tools or equipment |
We’re currently gathering data on the huge corporates financially backing these organisations. The Name and Shame coming up from this research will change the products and services you buy and who you buy them from. I can let you know the lists include Banks, Car manufacturers, Hygiene products, Clothing manufacturers and BIG retailers. Most have been supporting this Minority Disruptor group in complete knowledge of their Societal damage for either short term profits or to sell more product