Page under construction. Information incomplete and unedited.

Legal inequity is the single most dangerous area of Men’s Equity. Legal inequity can be broken down to several areas of law.

• Parenting
• Property Division
• Domestic Violence
• Criminal law
• False Allegations
• Kangaroo Courts
• Right of Reprisal

It doesn’t matter what area of life we look at. There has never been a period in history where females have been so empowered. Likewise, Females have never had the freedoms they currently have. In itself, that should be a good thing. I notice my own language there saying SHOULD. Why?

Because in the history of the world, women or at least some of them, have never been as angry, demanding, entitled or unhappy as they are now. Law after law, campaign after campaign, insult after insult. I’m seriously starting to question this.

If men want to have any form of relationship with females in this era, there have just too many risks. To have to hand over the keys to everything you’ve ever worked for just to even find out if you’re compatible.

Right of Reprisal

A central theme throughout the revisions, changes, combined alterations being demanded by the Radical Feminists show clear and deliberate intent.

• Females can choose to do as much damage to a male as they choose.
• Females can sue claiming damages any time they feel aggrieved by a male.
• Men have no ability to respond to Female attacks.
• Males can never claim damages for unfair, inappropriate or illegal damage Females do to a male.

If you think this sounds like hate speech or worse, sound ludicrous, read the detail in the linked pages, do your own research checking validity then read the information below

Females can choose to do as much damage to a male as they choose.

Whether by family law, control of the children, stripping a male of assets, false allegations and so forth, females can unfairly choose to destroy virtually any part of a Males life. When I say unfairly choose, I’m differentiating between acting fairly with honesty, truthful integrity as opposed to acting unfairly with dishonesty, untruth and deceptiveness. Sometimes the latter is guided by lawyers to maximise damage, other times it’s premeditated.

Females can sue claiming damages any time they feel aggrieved by a male.

Females are very enabled to pursue financial damages in many cases they feel aggrieved by men. Usually a cornerstone of civil action is to have the man convicted of a criminal offence to provide a basis for action. however

Men have no ability to respond to Female attacks.

The police and the judicial system refuse in all but the most severe and damaging publicised cases will not take action for false allegations of many offences including assault, Sexual Assault, false AVO applications etc on the basis it MAY discourage other victims to come forward. This is outright ludicrous. If I own a bank and report a fake robbery in an attempt to scam insurance, I would certainly be prosecuted. No other robbed bank would feel discouraged to report the robbery. The only possible EXCUSE to accept this moronic justification would be if women were seriously unequal to men such as under Sharia Law.

Males can’t claim damages for unfair, inappropriate or illegal damage Females do to a male.

If False allegations are neither investigated or prosecuted when those offences have been committed, it’s much more difficult or outright impossible to prove responsibility for the illegal damaging actions. Clearly, this puts females in a position where they’re virtually immuned from consequence of any type when scheming, planning and executing illegal attack on men. See this page for explanation.

We’ve all seen how this attitude has shifted the Family court to be a completely one-sided Male-Destroying and stripping institution.

As everyone knows, the stance of the Family court is that it’s not in the best interests of the child to prosecute the mother for planned, premeditated and prefabricated lies specifically designed for maximum character assasination of the males. It’s equaly as understood in both Australia and many countries where foreign brides target Australian men that if a male cannot substantiate with undisputable documentation, every statement he makes, he will probably be charged and imprisoned for perjury as I discovered in my experience.

These same principals are now being applied to Female Criminal behaviour

Flailing Rights for Males

When you combine the potential for damage men are exposed to in Child custody, Property Division, Domestic Violence, Criminal law, False Allegations, Kangaroo Courts with virtually no Rights of Reprisal, how can anyone possibly consider this is EQUALITY?

Sadly, I’ve retired all this to playing with my Big Boy toys, with friends, permanently unpartnered, specifically because this is just so far out of balance and getting worse annually. My young adult son (a lawyer) recognises this too. I don’t know what he’ll do in the future but he’s seeing this for himself now when he has to do Family Law cases in his job.

I’m seriously curious, how many females have ever considered these factors or considered their effects on the choices of respectable men to either enter or fully commit to relationships. Please, as long as you can discuss this constructively, let me know.

If men try to discuss these issues, they’re Mansplaining.

If men try to break the Feminist Monolog, they’re Manterupting

If we’re dissatisfied or walk away, We’re Manbabies

If women are genuinely not capable of discussing genuine requirements honorably and have to hide behind Sleazed in One sided Deliberate INEQUALITY legislation, you’ve made your own beds. This has become so bad legally, men have to pray a woman will be nice or fair and not hurt us if we put our ghoulies in her left hand and a reciprocating saw in her right hand.

We all know every female who promises fairness and equity will uphold that promise when a lawyer starts telling her what “She is ENTITLED to”, don’t we? Remember the “Believe Her and “Me Too” movements both ensure not a single poor innocent defenceless female has ever lied and further remember, if you don’t agree, you’re part of the tyrannical oppressing patriarchy Male dominance order!

The only two options males have under all these new rules is become Manpuppies, roll on our backs hoping for a Tummy rub or Walk Away. Male choices effectively finish upon establishment of cohabitation, legally.